IN
PLACE OF PASSING
The journey began in St. Georges market, on a slightly damp morning
with the artists taking up their respective positions in and around
the already bustling market. Those already familiar with the station-like
space will remember the aroma of seafood. Although the market is open
to the street from three sides, the humidity engendered by the throng,
and the Belfast weather in general, ensures that the various odours
remain trapped; adding to the general atmosphere of dense airlessness
in which the less meteorologically optimistic shoppers found themselves
on that day.
As the transactions took place I was reminded of the distinctly ageless
or age old character of the market place, the ‘civilising’
flavour of economy, of meeting,, mixed with the mild pleasures of just
looking. (Perhaps even the horrific slave markets of the Caribbean once
cloaked themselves in this kind of ‘normality’) Nevertheless,
one can imagine the market place as having been something like an original,
secular public space where the economic imaginary met an aesthetic of
display and the good order of things tastefully arranged. Indeed the
‘orality’ of discernment denoted by the word ‘taste’
seems to announce at the outset one of the reasons the venue has often
been thought so appropriate in the first place. (The messenger Hermes,
noted as a symbol of the creative mind, is also the protector of trade
and of thieves)
Another and important reason resides in the notion that as economy consists
in the rational arrangement of the relations between production, circulation
and consumption, a performance art that brings an alternative, but equally
meaningful, kind of rationality to that situation, makes the nature
of transaction itself appear as item for thought, if only for the brief
duration of exchange that characterises the performance work. That,
of course, must attend to notions of judgement and of value whose object
must remain the unique and irreducible nature of the works themselves.
Moreover, it is in wishing to preserve the opacity of the work, that
I find myself in broad agreement with Aristotle when he treats it as
a matter of little consequence whether or not an artist has a reflective
understanding of what it is they’re doing when they create works.
This is to be on the side of the artist rather than against him/her
in that, as Aristotle contends further, the ability to make good works
resides in a capacity for metaphor; in perceiving similarities; a talent
that cannot be taught. Indeed it may be particularly applicable in the
case of a poetic art that a modicum of irrationality and perhaps even
a touch of insanity might be necessary in making these important leaps
of productive imagination.
Elvira Santa Maria from Mexico was the first artist that I saw beginning
to make work. She had a large black bin-liner that she had filled with
air and then tied off at the bottom. Santa Maria then proceeded to wallop
the inflated bag into the air with her hand making an audible slapping
sound as it was lifted by the force of the blow. Walking at a pace in
keeping with the drift of the ‘balloon’ she moved through
the busy aisles between the stalls repeating the said action. Of course,
the appearance of this kind of playful activity began to attract attention,
and as many of the other artists had begun to do their work there was
a visible series of ‘double takes’ and “what the!”-
comments.
It doesn’t take an incredible leap of empathy to imagine being
rudely awoken from a shopping delirium, but there is a definite sense
of delight and wonder at the unfolding order of events. Children, needless
to say, have a natural affinity for imaginative play and experimentation
and their capacity for astonishment is infectious. Perhaps one of the
most significant aspects of the artists use of the black bag lay in
her attempts to keep it buoyant. A sense of the hope embedded in experimentation,
a hope that might require sustained effort but that is nevertheless
independent of any notion of ultimate utility.
In L’Derry Santa Maria filled the bag with helium and, with it
tied to her hair on a length of string, she walked along the walls from
Double Bastion via Bishop’s Gate to Market Street. Between the
bag and the tuft of hair that held it, was tied one white feather. Of
course feathers are heavily loaded with symbolic value and in Aztec
and Mayan culture, for example, they were associated with the Moon and
the growth of plant life, as indeed were hair, grass and rain. Feathers
and hair are thus associated with ascent. Just as the rains water the
earth, which gives forth skyward growing plants, hair reminds us of
this essential fecundity. The notions of ascent and freedom attached
to hair did not escape the restrictions placed on them by the Christian
Church as women were required to cover their locks- as if they might
have recourse to ideas of bodily and moral freedom.
At the Giants Causeway the artist allowed two bags held in her hands
to be caught by the inshore breeze. The polygonal structure of the Causeway,
at the place she was standing, slips into the sea at an angle of between
forty and forty-five degrees so it seemed as if Santa Maria were using
the wind- resistance of the sacks simply to preserve her balance. Or
perhaps to distantly echo the technology of Columbus and Magellan, and
like More’s ‘Nonsenso’ (Hythlodaeus) who, having sailed
with Vespucci, returns with tales of a ‘Noplace’; an island
of exotic political practices (!), Santa Maria’s performance becomes
a painful and playful historical cipher for the Conquistadorial events
that gave More’s Utopia (1516) such impetus. It is with reference
to this deeper sense of play as a serious activity that Gadamer explains;
We are used to talking about the element of play proper to all human
culture. We discover forms of play in the most serious kinds of human
activity: in ritual, in the administration of justice, in social behaviour
in general, where we can even speak of role playing and so forth. A
certain self- imposed limitation of our freedom seems to belong to the
very structure of culture.
As Alexis de Tocqueville has written, “Human societies, like persons,
become something worthwhile only through the use of their liberty.”
Upon reflection might it not be the case that within the intentional
structures of any finely wrought activity like Santa Maria’s performance,
as just one example of the capability to use our freedom with and for
others; that in speaking of a ‘certain self – imposed limitation’
belonging to the arena of exchange we are talking of nothing other than
the epitome of politics as the call to responsibility characteristic
of discourse itself? The seriousness of the artist’s balloon play
and the buoyancy of what is usually weighty; filled with stuff; words,
is a timely pharmakon to the ‘sharpener of sophisms in his house
of truncated quotations’.
Just inside the south entrance of the market stood Berlin- based artist
Boris Nieslony. Wearing a mask and holding a substantial 8ft staff in
one hand, and a cup in the other, with what looked like wild flowers
tied to his wrist, he rapped the pole on the concrete floor intermittently.
Holding the cup out in begging fashion the sharp clash of the wood on
the concrete startled some people as they move passed.
The mask was a seriously disturbing image of a mutilated and murdered
man’s face, one of many that Nieslony has archived. One cannot
help but be reminded by this powerful act, that what lies at the heart
of human suffering and our capacity for evil, is the demand for justice
coming from those whose voices have been taken from them. Moreover as
the site of our ultimate responsibility, the face of the other, as Emanuel
Levinas has shown, does not appear as a representation but expresses
itself. While Nieslony’s mask is nevertheless a photograph; an
image (in one sense it recalls the ecce homo tradition of representations
of the suffering Christ) this mask is of a human being who can no longer
express himself; is also abjectly exposed to cruelty and death.
The possibility of murder calls us to allow ourselves to be instructed
by kindness and the non- violence of discourse wherein the other is
seen as a teacher of justice. The begging cup is perhaps indicative
of a plea for generosity with the flowers offered as a kind of thanks.
Nieslony in his performance manifests this ethic of reciprocity, his
act is one that gives a figure to that summons, and in this work’s
case, functions both as an indictment against this ‘infinite withholding
of happiness’ and a call to be vigilant.
While it might be somewhat easy to ascribe this kind of reading to the
work, given its visceral nature, on a literal level Nieslony’s
performance on the Giant’s causeway on day three of the journey,
points to a bearing and a bearing of weight that is perhaps in tune
with a notion that responsibility- as an ability is something that one
‘activates’ as in ‘a taking upon oneself to do’.
While on his way down to the causeway proper, the artist lifted a rock
onto his shoulder, carrying it some distance to the tourist- laden structure
itself. Having chosen his position on a height some short distance from
the sea, he lifted it onto his head, balancing it there for some time.
The rock, like the causeway, is composed of an extremely dense and therefore
weighty igneous basalt that must have caused no little discomfort to
the vertebrae in his neck and the top of his cranium. Like some great
inversion of the natural order, the bulk of the rock balanced on Nieslony’s
head and the column of air stretching above it to the limits of the
atmosphere, made him seem like a contemporary Heracles struggling to
hold up his enormous burden. The impression given by this lone caryatid
was of a kind one might indeed associate more often with architectural
features, but as an appropriative strategy that idea must remain rather
tenuous; all interpretations are not equally valid.
Where the rock may give rise to notions of immutability, and the sea
to notions of its opposite, or to notions of slow, incremental destruction,
of geological weathering, decay and new eruption, a performance between
the three figures of Pluto, Poseidon and Nieslony, who himself becomes
a figure of something else, perhaps requires no over- elaboration. However,
if context must weigh, lightly or heavily, as a factor in IPOP, it is
in L’Derry perhaps more than any other place in Northern Ireland
that it weighs most markedly.
The city’s most distinctive characteristic is history, being laden
and invested with all the contestations, recriminations and assertions
of right that those with even the most rudimentary knowledge of Northern
Irish politics might have come to expect. The artist’s performance
there on day two, which was essentially an act in tandem with those
of Alasdair MacLennan, and Sigmynt Pio Troski, indicated at least one
sense in which it was possible to read the work contextually so to speak.
The three artists had positioned themselves in the middle of Guildhall
Square, just outside the 17th century walls. Nieslony lay on his left
side facing the hall, lifting what looked like barley seeds from a small
white ceramic cup, and placing them in his ear one by one.
Obviously, one is not born with an ideology, one has it planted in one’s
ear as it were, and although that is not in the first instance necessarily
always a bad thing, ideologies do have an uncanny habit of distorting
the very thing that constitutes them as positive in the first place.
That is to say they distort the relation between you and I when I can
no longer see myself in you because you do not share my dearly held
beliefs. Thence emerges the clogged hearing in which dialogue is substituted
for violence and I have let it happen; wanted it to happen.
It would be wrong to ascribe such an overwrought didacticism, to quote
Aquinas as ‘quem auctor intendit’, to Nieslony’s performance,
but that art might be the site of such an inscription and be the bearer
of certain anamnetic lessons is at least a possibility and more importantly
an act of resistance to the fossilisation of an original symbolic synthesis.
And if by symbol we imply a semiotic system, then rhetorical forms such
as metaphor are clearly a part of that complex play of signification.
Esther Ferrier is a Paris based artist from the Basque country in Spain.
Her materials consisted of things that can be purchased in the market
itself; a role of off white masking tape and some sticks of chalk with
which to write on the floor. Having written the legend ‘walking
is the way’ at her starting point, Ferrier moved along the market
aisles laying the tape out in front of her in an exaggerated stepping
manner. If in a basic sense performance can lift our minds toward the
contemplation of the uncanny, the surprising or the merely neglected,
Ferrier’s obviation of the paths that are laid out for us and
through which we are ‘allowed’ to move, makes that demarcation
between public and franchised space available to thought. Of course
the notions surrounding the constructed nature of spaces and their uses
are a marked feature of performance’s ‘remit’, generally
speaking, and so the precedents concerning this work (as well as that
of the other artists) make it a lot richer in the viewing for all those
observing the process (some not only observing but ‘participating’;
pulling the tape up behind her). Performances that construct a trace
in the space, as it were, are familiar from Carl Schlemmer’s detailed
diagrams like Gesture Dance (1926) in his work with the Bauhaus, to
Bruce Nauman’s Walking in an Exaggerated Manner Around the Perimeter
of a Square (1968).
A concern for the objectness of the body and temporality as it concerns
duration may be historically significant aspects of Ferrier’s
work but actually seeing it performed is a different order of experience
compared to reading anthologies. In Derry the artist walked along the
walls slinging ping-pong balls over the battlements to be lifted by
passers-by. Each ball had something written on it, in one case for example,
the message read “What is the answer to give”. For every
ball launched Ferrier stuck a number to her face, eventually covering
the greater part of it. This action may have been intended to refer
to the military history of the city; many of its cannons are still in
place, and whereas they once presented a mortal threat to any would
be besieger, Ferrier’s tiny balls present, of course, a different
kind of ‘engagement’ altogether.
There is still a military presence within the walls of the old city,
overlooking the Bogside area, site of some of the more ‘famous’
incidents of N. Ireland’s recent history. Sporting state of the
art surveillance equipment, the contemporary installation is in keeping
with historical developments in military technology that saw the construction
of the walls themselves in 1618. In contradistinction to the high circumvallations
of medieval fortresses, Londonderry stands as an example of the trace
italienne design that began to appear after the fall of Constantinople
to Mehmet the II’s army in 1453. Mehmet’s gigantic wrought
iron cannon- firing huge stone projectiles- made it clear that high
defensive walls could no longer be counted on as impregnable. The development
of the relatively low, thick, star- shaped fortress became essentially
a design meant to utilise the new technology, giving a wide and potentially
murderous field of fire to those besieged in them. Derry’s walls
were never breached and so serve today as both a symbol of heroic resistance
and of colonial domination. Caught between Mehmet II and William III
the walls represent both the local history of ethno- religious conflict
and the intensely global flavour of that conflict’s embeddedness
within the wider narratives of European power struggles after 1492.
The traditional enmities in Northern Ireland remain, and so are not
yet properly speaking, historical. Ferrier’s intervention in the
midst of the written and the not yet written presents us with an impossible
challenge. Many quietly believe the attitudes in Northern Ireland to
be somehow intractable. That impossible intractability is acknowledged
here only in the sense in which Derrida re-imagines the category of
the impossible as an other than nihilistic or disabling proposition.
As an affirmation it is precisely im-possibility that reveals possibility;
makes it possible, in the sense that it is only when the power of my
possibility is displaced and conditioned by an/other (s) possibility
that an im-possible possible is allowed to return. According to Derrida
this other possible returns as a spectre from the crypt of ‘my’
own possible in the form of an in- coming other as gift, surprise, hospitality.
The im- of the im-possible is no doubt radical, implacable, undeniable.
But it is not simply negative or dialectical; it introduces to the possible…
it makes it come, it makes it revolve according to an anachronistic
temporality or incredible filiality- a filiality which is also the origin
of faith.
If faith carries any force whatsoever it must be in this sense; the
sense of an eschatology as yet unwritten, not yet codified in dogma
or already fulfilled in belief. Perhaps Ferrier’s performance
in Derry also carries the ‘trace’ of this in- credibility.
The Rome-based French Canadian artist Miriam Laplante with speakers
attached to her chest began a kind of waltz to the subsonic tones of
Barry White’s ‘My Everything’ as she wove in and out
of, and around the shoppers and stalls. This solitary but public dance
immediately attracted attention and, I’m convinced, even some
expressions of fear on the faces of a few of those in close proximity.
I noticed the same look some years ago in a bar in Ventimiglia just
across the French border with Italy. A man, obviously the victim of
some affliction, began shouting and gyrating around the coffee tables,
although, admittedly, he had some class of a rock in his hand where
Laplante is holding a less potentially offensive ‘walkman’.
That said it should be remembered that Salome’s dance for Herod
was not without a kind of lethality. If there is a point to this anec/dotage
it must lie in a contemplation of the opprobrium that those with mental
illnesses have come to suffer, doubly, in our society.
A somewhat less depressing but related idea concerns the notion of actions
and their context. Of course we would not be surprised to find someone
dancing at say a rock concert, but if what is ordinarily speaking a
familiar action removed from its familiar context then automatically
we are forced to begin to try to imagine what the possibilities are.
That kind of immediate emotional response to the irruption of the unfamiliar
is probably a deep seated, very human reaction. Tentatively, it may
even characterise the modern relation to art itself; no longer the transparently
recognisable medium of familiar narratives. We are familiar with the
histrionics that accompany some contemporary responses to art. The highly
ordered, ritualised forms of dance ordinarily at home elsewhere in their
contexts, but transplanted by Laplante to the market, could perhaps,
be seen in relation to Walter F. Otto’s notion that the Greek
Gods actually represent aspects of world itself. According to Gadamer,
this is why their machinations in Greek drama still carry the freshest
of significances. Even though we are separated by great expanses of
human time from Greek drama’s cultic and religious meanings, our
experience of the world ensures they remain to be understood. “They
remain real for us because we too can still be dismayed by a sudden
transformation in the appearance of things – one event can change
everything at a stroke.”
As Greek drama may appeal to our experience of the world La Plante’s
structured gestures in her performance constitute an event that has
the capacity to transform our normative expectations regarding the world
of as yet unimagined experiences. The artist’s performance at
the abandoned Quarry near Carrickarede involved her walking slowly around
the perimeter of the limestone space with something attached to her
left ankle. On closer inspection the object turned out to be a large
spotted dog, something like a sinister child’s toy, its teeth
clamped around her leg. As the dog dragged behind her there was again
this sense of familiarity, of an incident from childhood with the maladjusted
neighbourhood mutt.
Noted more usually as a cipher for fidelity and loyalty, the dog represents
also a notion of nature meddled with. Many will be familiar with the
stories of certain breeds that have turned on their owners, or attacked
farm animals; I can remember one television advert that asked the question
“do you know where your dog goes at night?” Or words to
that effect. Behind this lies the fear that we have not really been
able to suppress millions of years of evolution. There is still some
remnant of the wolf in your average Pekinese. Perhaps this is part of
the story of Romulus and Remus. At the heart of civilisation lurks a
terrible id that must be named for it to be properly controlled. Many
foundation myths carry the notion of elemental mother deities like the
Hellenistic Eurynome or the Assyrian Babylonian Tiamat a goddess of
the chaotic abyss. In Hebrew she is Tehomat and was dealt with by Yahweh,
just as Tiamat was sundered by Marduk to create the heavens and the
earth.
While it is scarcely likely that Laplante would acquiesce in this treatment
of the female- as/in- myth, that societies carry the stain of violence,
is probably nearer the point. In one sense this could be related to
the artist’s performance in L’ Derry. Standing to the right
side of Shipquay gate just a few meters from the seat of the Bloody
Sunday inquiry Laplante seemed to be making reference to the figure
of justice. Another female embodiment of an abstract, she stood on one
leg holding three eggs in each hand, much like the familiar scales associated
with the statue. She was not, however blindfolded in the traditional
fashion, or holding a sword, but wore an array of flowers on her head.
The performance lasted perhaps some forty minutes, at the end of which
she dropped the eggs, which naturally enough, splattered on the ground
in front of her. Perhaps that calls to mind certain aspects of fragility
associated with expectations of fairness, of healing, or reconciliation.
‘Things’ that we may demand of law in the face of injustice,
that it can never fully transcend- Paul Ricoeur;
there exists a place within society- however violent society might remain
owing to its origin or custom- where words do win out over violence.
Yes, the parties to a trial do not necessarily leave the courtroom pacified.
For that, they would have to have covered the path of mutual recognition
to its end.
The Norwegian artist Kurt Johanssen is a tall man and presented a striking
figure in a black suit, discalced, carrying two galvanised steel buckets-
brim filled with a sky-blue paint. His progress through the melee had
the slow considered pace of an old man carrying buckets of sky- reflecting
water, some distance home from a well. The intensity of the pigment,
reminiscent of the skies in the Tres riches heures of the Limbourg brothers,
began to spark off associations with the colours of the wares on display
around the stalls. There were a lot of blue things in the market. The
quietude of this performance, the absence of any sudden changes in pace
or direction allow the spectator to take in the surroundings, make casual
associations, or just watch the play of the liquid in the buckets as
it reacts to the moment of Johanssen’s gait. Before the development
of synthetic pigments for the textile trade a man carrying buckets of
blue paint through a market might have presented a good target for thieves.
As among the most highly prised of materials the blue, ground from lapis
lazuli, was usually reserved for the most illustrious of subjects, as
was the case in the representation of Christian deities; personages
deserving of such expense as befitted their position in the firmament.
Whatever the cases may be, however tenuous, that are made for interpreting
the colour blue, or its use in any given situation, the delight taken
in unearthing hidden symbolic contents is probably as old as language
itself. It has often been said, ironically speaking, that Northern Ireland
is a society particularly at home in a symbolic universe. But the symbols
one sees around the place and in particular areas are not of the same
sort, since the meanings they convey are anything but obscure, at least
to those toward whom they are directed. The silver lining is this: There
is a kind of optimism to the thought of communication as a rule governed
activity, which we tacitly agree to follow. It’s a start.
On the Rathlin Island leg of the tour, Johanssen stood right on the
very edge of the cliffs overlooking the Atlantic Ocean. Extending from
his mouth, and over the lip of the precipice, a long plexus of thin,
multicoloured wires of the sort one finds in a junction box. Seeing
this at first was somehow as one would imagine some sci-fi android with
its innards pulled out through its mouth. One could only view the performance
obliquely, since it would have been dangerous to go anywhere near the
front of the artist. That the image was arresting would be to understate
the sheer beauty of how this looked. The black figure soaring against
the intense blues of the sky and the sea, no distinct horizon, several
species of sea bird turning on the air currents beneath.
Just to mention Caspar David Freidrich would be to labour an association
unnecessarily. Although the location is more often than not rather windswept
and dramatic, on this day, it seemed more like the Aegean. Sites like
that on Rathlin would once have animated the religious imagination of
that particular brand of Irish monasticism called to the desolate places,
(Yahweh is, after all, a God of the desert), that flourished in Ireland
around the time that Bede (673-735 AD) was composing his history of
Ceolfrith’s journey to Rome from Jarrow with the Codex Amiatinus.
Skellig Micheal, a large rock off the South coast of Ireland, is a good
example of how such a community was organised. Johanssen’s communication
bundle, spilling out of his mouth and over the abyssal edge, could for
all that be a reminder of a different sort of abnegation of contact.
The solitary ego cogitans in his bedroom cell, connected to a Cartesian
Aleph, (of Borges’ Buenos Aires, not Dante’s Paradiso);
a live, simultaneous, downloading ecstasy of scopo- degradation.
Belfast based artist Alastair MacLennan entered the market carrying
two galvanised steel buckets, each holding a mackerel in a small amount
of water. One bucket also contained what appeared to be a dandelion
leaf; the fish next to it was upside down. MacLennan moved at a considered,
contemplative pace, moving past the stalls, and was at first barely
noticed as he appeared much like any other customer carrying his shopping.
However, the artist’s movements were not the random ones of casual
shoppers as they venture from stall to stall; attracted first to one
thing and then another. In this performance one gradually became aware
of an order like the invisible progress of the hands around the large
clock that dominates the market. One got the feeling from watching this
action that if time were speeded up MacLennan would remain as still
as the pole star, precessing in accordance with the earth’s wobble
around its axis. According to the seventh and sixth century pre- Socratic
philosophers of Greece, the origin of all things i.e., reality, lay
in water, in original infinity and in the air. It was their wish to
reduce the terrible multiplicity of things in the world to the intelligible
order of the one. “All things that are known have a number: without
number it would not be possible to know or think anything whatsoever.”
(Alain Badiou agrees) Pythagoras was the first to formulate the idea
systematically; in his opinion the origin of all things lay in the essential
order of number. His aesthetico- mathematic rule of music is a familiar
enough demonstration of this principle and notwithstanding the possible
significances of MacLennan’s materials (at one stage he purchases
batteries) it is this essential ordering trait that lends this performance
just one aspect of its readability.
The Polish artist, Artur Tabjer, appears dragging a chair and various
objects toward the South entrance of the market. The din of a chair
being pulled along the floor cuts through the dull buzz of business
that is amplified, several orders above comfort, by the echoing space.
As he takes up his position sitting on his chair near Boris Nieslony,
Tabjer places a small black bag over his head. He is also wearing white
gloves and holding a small placard with the phrases ‘I love you’,
‘I need you’, ‘I hate you’ printed on it. Music
is coming from a speaker hung around his neck. Apart from the immediate
association with the infamous images of torture in the Abu Greib prison
in Iraq, the notion of a gesture that amplifies, in this strangely formal
manner, emotions like love and hate; pivoting around an assertion of
need, begins to ask questions about the nature of this I/Thou relation
presented by the artist. The structure of these short assertions at
first seems to intimate a certain kind of interchange/ability between
the notions of love hate and need that may be almost arbitrarily inserted
into the space between this I and you formulation. Becoming the slogan
like sentences found in advertising or spin, the formal look of the
print seems to want to empty the words of the force of their meaning.
However, it is precisely this action that must force us to consider
them more closely, given not least, the context of their ‘announcement’.
The identity of the artist is concealed so ‘we’ (passers-by)
are faced with a problem of ascription that further complicates the
notion of just who it is that is speaking/acting. (hooded figures for
whom human beings are just objects or signifiers for something they
oppose, are a commonplace in N. Ireland) In ordinary conversation we
are used to knowing the identity of the person we are speaking with
or at least catching the meaningful intonations of speech and other
non verbal means of understanding like gesture and facial expression.
As the potential recipients of this ‘I’s’ need, love,
hate we become the nervous objects of this anonymous address. Or perhaps
it is the negation of the identity within the hood, a condition of utter
vulnerability, that calls for another interpretation. If the ‘I’
of this act is addressing us from a position of self imposed defencelessness
then might it be that we are being asked to consider ourselves also
as beings that address others from such a position of vulnerability?
In recognising that weakness this ‘I’ that is the site of
love need or hate is forced to re-examine the demand that wishes to
gather the other under the sign of what is mine; my love, my hate, my
need. At least this might secure the un-immediacy of a relation that
says that perhaps the other one is never completely commensurate with
my love, my hate or my need.
The Finnish artist Roi Vaara, wearing a black suit, a nest box on his
head, and carrying a portable stereo, makes his way around the market.
Coming from the cd player is the call of a cuckoo, a bird known for
planting its eggs in the nests of other birds. This practice amounts
to a kind of evolutionary side-step wherein the cuckoo delegates the
costly process of having to provide for its own offspring. However,
interestingly, this never seems to result in anything like an identity
confusion suffered on the part of the juvenile. The cuckoo always knows
itself as a cuckoo even if its erstwhile parents happen to be swallows,
blue tits or whatever. (whereas the imprinting process in other species
is seen to be important with the hatchlings of some captivity-bred birds
taking themselves for humans for instance). Nature, of course, is replete
with deceptions of this kind- camouflages, visual deceits, mimicry-
one need only think of hoverflies, stick insects or anglerfish to realise
the advantages of this incredible adaptivity within nature. While Vaara’s
appearance in this performance does not represent any direct attempt
at mimicry in the sense that we are meant to take him for some other
thing that presents itself in nature, it is nevertheless a visible gesture
that reflects the world of meaning from which it arises. Many meanings
could of course reside in the referential or symbolic values one might
attach to the materials of this performance; the nest box with its single
entrance hole and perch is reminiscent of something like the distribution
of features on a face. One might recall the Cyclops of Homer’s
Odyssey, or the nest itself as a kind of symbolic ‘birth- place’
of the imagination. However multivalent and potentially loaded the work
may be, one aspect of Vaara’s performance in the market consists
in the sheer pleasure generated by the gesture itself. As it conceals
as much as it reveals; what it reveals is perhaps primarily the ‘being
of meaning’ rather than the knowledge of it as such. Like Kafka’s
Gregor, who upon waking up one morning to find himself transformed into
a gigantic insect, proceeds nonetheless to worry about being late for
work- the ‘readerly’ delight that the appearance of the
extraordinary among the mundane generates in our imagination, is also
something that makes the mundane itself appear as a condition of possibilities.
Standing just outside the North entrance to the market the Polish artist
Sigmynt Pio Troski has set out his space. Roughly one metre square,
four thin metal rods have been planted between the joins in the pavement
slabs, each rod sporting a small plastic flag with the phrase ‘ground
work’ printed on it. Standing very still his movements if any
are extremely minimal; extending on occasion to turning his palms upward
in an almost prayer-like manner. Of course what appears most readily
available to understanding here is what is immediately available to
be read, namely the printed text on the flags. The yellow and black
colours of these pennants present themselves in nature, again, as a
warning. This accounts, simply speaking, for their use on construction
sites among other similar situations in which hazards may be a factor.
Beyond the ostensive aspects of what might contribute to the notion
of what a work might refer to, it may be interesting to consider, however
briefly, the notion of temporality that Pio Troski’s performance
seems to call to mind. Upon reflection it is in seeing this work that
certain aspects of time, ordinarily associated with clock time, spring
to mind. However it is in a sense other than that linked to a mechanically
represented notion of the division of time into units of measurement
that seem to be valid here. (not to mention the relatively recent standardisation
of time associated with the development of the Great Western Railway
in England). If the temporality of performance has only minimal aspects
in common with practices involving ritual-like actions, one of those
must be in the basic sense that it involves a certain suspension of
that mechanical order in which one thing follows upon another and sooner
or later must reach a conclusion, that is as a logic of the linear.
Of course we are all familiar with this idea of time and it is no less
a necessary one in the organisation of our daily lives- I have time
to go shopping, I have no time to eat etc. However, perhaps it is in
the suspension of this kind of powerlessness with regard to time that
we can speak of a kind of temporality more in tune with a mythic notion
that is particularly human; subject to limit. A degree of human time
that is neither the continuous inevitable flow of infinite, cosmic time
or the miniscule differentiations of atomic clocks. The word ‘timelessness’
evokes an aspect of that suspension of linearity belonging to myth.
For instance Christian mythology tells of a cleft in the floor of the
church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem, traditional site of the crucifixion,
where upon Jesus’ death this crack opened up allowing his blood
to spill onto the skull of Adam, giving him life. The Christian story
thereby appears at the beginning of time! This circularity, of course,
functions to separate the sacred narrative from the normal flow of profane
history. Nonetheless, there is something interestingly discontinuous
about this sense of time which is, perhaps, more immediately illustrated
in memory when we think about how we felt time as children, and how
we feel it now; how we feel time when we are happy, or how we feel it
when we are anxious about something. It is in this sense that time is
particularly our own, or that a performance has a time that belongs
to it and that contributes to its unique flavour. Pio Troski’s
ground work does not provide us with myths or symbols to elaborate upon,
but does call us, in one sense, to consider time; that which belongs
to us and to the space of the work.